时间:2020-11-24 16:18:52 | 栏目:JAVA代码 | 点击:次
因为一直用spring整合了mybatis,所以很少用到mybatis的session缓存。 习惯是本地缓存自己用map写或者引入第三方的本地缓存框架ehcache,Guava
所以提出来纠结下
实验下(spring整合mybatis略,网上一堆),先看看mybatis级别的session的缓存
放出打印sql语句
configuration.xml 加入
<settings> <!-- 打印查询语句 --> <setting name="logImpl" value="STDOUT_LOGGING" /> </settings>
测试源代码如下:
dao类
/** * 测试spring里的mybatis为啥用不上缓存 * * @author 何锦彬 2017.02.15 */ @Component public class TestDao { private Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(TestDao.class.getName()); @Autowired private SqlSessionTemplate sqlSessionTemplate; @Autowired private SqlSessionFactory sqlSessionFactory; /** * 两次SQL * * @param id * @return */ public TestDto selectBySpring(String id) { TestDto testDto = (TestDto) sqlSessionTemplate.selectOne("com.hejb.TestDto.selectByPrimaryKey", id); testDto = (TestDto) sqlSessionTemplate.selectOne("com.hejb.TestDto.selectByPrimaryKey", id); return testDto; } /** * 一次SQL * * @param id * @return */ public TestDto selectByMybatis(String id) { SqlSession session = sqlSessionFactory.openSession(); TestDto testDto = session.selectOne("com.hejb.TestDto.selectByPrimaryKey", id); testDto = session.selectOne("com.hejb.TestDto.selectByPrimaryKey", id); return testDto; } }
测试service类
@Component public class TestService { @Autowired private TestDao testDao; /** * 未开启事务的spring Mybatis查询 */ public void testSpringCashe() { //查询了两次SQL testDao.selectBySpring("1"); } /** * 开启事务的spring Mybatis查询 */ @Transactional public void testSpringCasheWithTran() { //spring开启事务后,查询1次SQL testDao.selectBySpring("1"); } /** * mybatis查询 */ public void testCash4Mybatise() { //原生态mybatis,查询了1次SQL testDao.selectByMybatis("1"); } }
输出结果:
testSpringCashe()方法执行了两次SQL, 其它都是一次
源码追踪:
先看mybatis里的sqlSession
跟踪到最后 调用到 org.apache.ibatis.executor.BaseExecutor的query方法
try { queryStack++; list = resultHandler == null ? (List<E>) localCache.getObject(key) : null; //先从缓存中取 if (list != null) { handleLocallyCachedOutputParameters(ms, key, parameter, boundSql); //注意里面的key是CacheKey } else { list = queryFromDatabase(ms, parameter, rowBounds, resultHandler, key, boundSql); }
贴下是怎么取出缓存数据的代码
private void handleLocallyCachedOutputParameters(MappedStatement ms, CacheKey key, Object parameter, BoundSql boundSql) { if (ms.getStatementType() == StatementType.CALLABLE) { final Object cachedParameter = localOutputParameterCache.getObject(key);//从localOutputParameterCache取出缓存对象 if (cachedParameter != null && parameter != null) { final MetaObject metaCachedParameter = configuration.newMetaObject(cachedParameter); final MetaObject metaParameter = configuration.newMetaObject(parameter); for (ParameterMapping parameterMapping : boundSql.getParameterMappings()) { if (parameterMapping.getMode() != ParameterMode.IN) { final String parameterName = parameterMapping.getProperty(); final Object cachedValue = metaCachedParameter.getValue(parameterName); metaParameter.setValue(parameterName, cachedValue); } } } } }
发现就是从localOutputParameterCache就是一个PerpetualCache, PerpetualCache维护了个map,就是session的缓存本质了。
重点可以关注下面两个累的逻辑
PerpetualCache , 两个参数, id和map
CacheKey,map中存的key,它有覆盖equas方法,当获取缓存时调用.
这种本地map缓存获取对象的缺点,就我踩坑经验(以前我也用map去实现的本地缓存),就是获取的对象非clone的,返回的两个对象都是一个地址
而在spring中一般都是用sqlSessionTemplate,如下
<bean id="sqlSessionFactory" class="org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionFactoryBean"> <property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource" /> <property name="configLocation" value="classpath:configuration.xml" /> <property name="mapperLocations"> <list> <value>classpath*:com/hejb/sqlmap/*.xml</value> </list> </property> </bean> <bean id="sqlSessionTemplate" class="org.mybatis.spring.SqlSessionTemplate"> <constructor-arg ref="sqlSessionFactory" /> </bean>
在SqlSessionTemplate中执行SQL的session都是通过sqlSessionProxy来,sqlSessionProxy的生成在构造函数中赋值,如下:
this.sqlSessionProxy = (SqlSession) newProxyInstance( SqlSessionFactory.class.getClassLoader(), new Class[] { SqlSession.class }, new SqlSessionInterceptor());
sqlSessionProxy通过JDK的动态代理方法生成的一个代理类,主要逻辑在InvocationHandler对执行的方法进行了前后拦截,主要逻辑在invoke中,包好了每次执行对sqlsesstion的创建,common,关闭
代码如下:
private class SqlSessionInterceptor implements InvocationHandler { @Override public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable { // 每次执行前都创建一个新的sqlSession SqlSession sqlSession = getSqlSession( SqlSessionTemplate.this.sqlSessionFactory, SqlSessionTemplate.this.executorType, SqlSessionTemplate.this.exceptionTranslator); try { // 执行方法 Object result = method.invoke(sqlSession, args); if (!isSqlSessionTransactional(sqlSession, SqlSessionTemplate.this.sqlSessionFactory)) { // force commit even on non-dirty sessions because some databases require // a commit/rollback before calling close() sqlSession.commit(true); } return result; } catch (Throwable t) { Throwable unwrapped = unwrapThrowable(t); if (SqlSessionTemplate.this.exceptionTranslator != null && unwrapped instanceof PersistenceException) { // release the connection to avoid a deadlock if the translator is no loaded. See issue #22 closeSqlSession(sqlSession, SqlSessionTemplate.this.sqlSessionFactory); sqlSession = null; Throwable translated = SqlSessionTemplate.this.exceptionTranslator.translateExceptionIfPossible((PersistenceException) unwrapped); if (translated != null) { unwrapped = translated; } } throw unwrapped; } finally { if (sqlSession != null) { closeSqlSession(sqlSession, SqlSessionTemplate.this.sqlSessionFactory); } } } }
因为每次都进行创建,所以就用不上sqlSession的缓存了.
对于开启了事务为什么可以用上呢, 跟入getSqlSession方法
如下:
public static SqlSession getSqlSession(SqlSessionFactory sessionFactory, ExecutorType executorType, PersistenceExceptionTranslator exceptionTranslator) { notNull(sessionFactory, NO_SQL_SESSION_FACTORY_SPECIFIED); notNull(executorType, NO_EXECUTOR_TYPE_SPECIFIED); SqlSessionHolder holder = (SqlSessionHolder) TransactionSynchronizationManager.getResource(sessionFactory); // 首先从SqlSessionHolder里取出session SqlSession session = sessionHolder(executorType, holder); if (session != null) { return session; } if (LOGGER.isDebugEnabled()) { LOGGER.debug("Creating a new SqlSession"); } session = sessionFactory.openSession(executorType); registerSessionHolder(sessionFactory, executorType, exceptionTranslator, session); return session; }
在里面维护了个SqlSessionHolder,关联了事务与session,如果存在则直接取出,否则则新建个session,所以在有事务的里,每个session都是同一个,故能用上缓存了